Evaluation Criteria for Peer Editing Assignment

All four parts of the peer editing assignment must have the following:
*A characterization of the strengths and weaknesses of the writing with regard to this criterion
*Specific, quoted examples supporting/illustrating your conclusions about the strengths or weaknesses
*Constructive commentary about how to address the writing weaknesses -- Provide specific, helpful suggestions :  "Try it like this"

Here is the rubric I will use to evaluate your peer edit. The assignment will be a summative category score (90% category)

Peer Editing Evaluation

	0 This type of comment is frequently missing	1 Comments are generally unclear or incomplete	2 Comments are complete, but clarity and specificity is limited	3 Comments are clear, but more detail or specificity would make them useful	4 Detailed, specific  comments provide valuable insight and actionable feedback
Provides clear, effective description of both strengths and weaknesses
Provides specific, directly relevant examples of strengths and weaknesses quoted from the text
Provides detailed suggestions for improvement with specific suggestions that can be directly applied to the text: “Try it like this”